Carmelo Ferlito & Hizkia Respatiadi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A similar situation affects the egg market. Transport is 5.1% of the cost of the retail price for eggs. Similarly, the highest transport cost is that of imported raw materials from the port to the feed mill.

 

 

 

 

To understand how the infrastructure issue affects poultry operations in particular, consider that, for example, feed bins are usually not used on poultry farms in Indonesia because it is impossible, on the existing roads, to transport them to farms. Feed bins for poultry farms usually range from a three metric tonne to a 100 metric tonne capacity, with a diameter ranging from 1.5 to 5 meters and a height from 3 to 12 meters, and special trucks, which Indonesian roads often cannot support, are required to transport them. Farms instead build local small hoppers, which are continuously manually fed by workers.

In five weeks, a broiler chicken consumes around 3.3 kg (for an average body weight of 2.0 kg) of feed (Akinbobola, n.d.). An average broiler house (and a farm usually consists of several houses) holds around 25,000 birds, so consumption will reach around 81.7 tonnes of feed in five weeks, or 2.3 tonnes per day. According to the same source, the cumulative feed intake of layer chicken over 42 weeks is 4.7 kg. For a layer cage house of 50,000 birds, this means 232.8 tons in 42 weeks, or 0.791 tonnes per day. Given the volume of feed involved, it’s obvious this system is only viable for as long as labour costs remain low—as was outlined above, Badan Pusat Statistik estimates that wages represent respectively 9% and 16% of the production cost in broiler and layer farming.

An improvement in infrastructure will have several benefits on the final price of chicken and eggs. Not only should the impact of transport costs be reduced, lowering a cost of production, but better roads would allow the transport of specialized equipment such as feed bins.

Infrastructure has to be taken into account also from a more general perspective. Table 4 shows some poultry welfare measures related to loading and transport of the chickens from the hatchery to the farm and from the farm to the slaughter house.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The transport of chickens from hatchery to farm and from farm to the slaughter plant have to be done in a way that does not damage the birds. While the welfare and safety of the birds matters, in poultry farming chickens also represent the main capital good in production. Damage to their bodies translates to damage to the product and therefore the main income source. Poor road conditions can damage the birds, reducing meat quality. In addition, as mentioned in Table 4, chicks must be delivered to the place where they will be reared as soon as possible after hatching. Bad infrastructures, thus, could result in a delay to the birds’ access to feed and water.

As explained by Bergoug et al. (2013, p. 3301), EU legislation specifies that broiler chicks can be transported for a maximum of 24 hours and deprived of feed or water for, 72 hours at most after hatching. These standards are based on the fact that chicks’ metabolic reserves last up to three days. The first week of life is the most crucial in the life of DOCs. The risk of mortality is higher in this period and can be increased by combined stress of post-hatch handling in hatcheries,transportation, and poor adaptation to grow-out conditions (Bayliss and Hinton, 1990).

Policy recommendations 

Consideration of the topics in this report lead to policy recommendations for the Indonesian government. This section highlights four points of action: harmonization of regulations, parent stock import liberalization, maize import liberalization, and infrastructure improvement.

5.1 Harmonization of Regulations 

In previous sections, this report discussed contradictions between regulations of maize imports. Harmonizing existing regulations by clearing up contradictions between MOT 21/2018 and MOA 57/2015 is important to help importers avoid confusion and to reduce discretionary power in the import process that might affect the smooth progress of the industry.

The government should abolish the requirement for a letter of recommendation from the Ministry of Agriculture that is stipulated in MOA 57/2015 Article 16 in order to expedite the import licensing process.

5.2 Parent Stock Import Liberalization 

This report has discussed that the breeders that provide the genetic lines for broilers and layers are mainly imported. According to Articles 9 and 11 of MOA 26/2016, poultry producers are not free to import breeders according to their expected business needs. Instead, imports are regulated by supply and demand calculations by an analysis team appointed by the government.

The interaction between demand and supply is a dynamic process which unfolds over time. It is based on the discovery, interpretation, processing, and exchange of information. Experts can observe the outcomes of the market process as an emerging coordination pattern, but they cannot control it.

The final outcome of a market process unleashed from mandates based on government calculations would be better organization of the poultry value chain, followed by a reduction in prices due to competition and the consequent cost reduction (thanks to the implementation of better production methods in order to win market competitions).

Under a free trade regime, breeder import decisions would be left in the hands of the players in the poultry industry and therefore be based on profit expectations and entrepreneurial calculations. To make this possible, the government should abolish the parts of MOA 26/2016 (Articles 9 and 11) that make it illegal for private producers to import parent stock.

"Harmonizing exisiting regulations by clearing up contradictions between MOT 21/2018 and MOA 57/2015 is important to help importers avoid confusion and to reduce discretionary power in the import process that might affect the smooth progress of the industry."

5.3 Maize Import Liberalization 

The argument in section 5.2 can be extended to the import of maize, and Indonesia’s maize industry should be opened to the international market. In addition to the arguments made for parent stock, which also apply to the maize market, the law of comparative advantage explains why Indonesia and its trading partners would both benefit from an opened maize market.

Under existing regulations, Indonesian poultry producers are paying virtually double the price they could be paying for one of their key raw materials. It goes without saying that this additional cost is reflected in market prices for chicken and eggs, and this limits both domestic consumption possibilities and further expansion of the industry. Moreover, since chicken is a major source of protein in Indonesia,34 higher prices are particularly hard on the lower income population.

The government should liberalize maize imports in Indonesia through revisions to MOT 21/2018 and MOA 57/2015. This would allow the country to specialize in the production of goods in which it can perform more efficiently. Indonesia clearly does not have a comparative advantage in maize production and could import it at a lower price. This would decrease poultry production costs, benefitting not only poultry producers but also consumers, in particular low income consumers, by making it possible to provide cheaper chicken and eggs.

Eliminating trade protections for maize could also allow Indonesia to modernize its poultry industry, becoming more efficient and perhaps developing its own comparative advantage in the future, potentially turning the country into a poultry exporter, enhancing business opportunities and creating advantages in the labour market.

5.4 Infrastructure Improvement 

Although the Indonesian poultry market would benefit from the removal of government interference in the liberalization of trade in strategic elements such as parent stock and feed, we can recognize a role for the government in supporting economic development through infrastructure projects. Infrastructure is a strategic part of a sound development framework. This report has discussed the reasons that transportation is an important element in the total production cost both for chicken and eggs, and that the most intensive transportation costs occur between the port and the feed mill.

The government should invest in improving the road system, with a focus on connecting ports with nearby agriculture areas. This would naturally benefit the production process by making lower freight fares possible. Improved transportation infrastructure would also allow the movement of heavy equipment that would help Indonesian poultry farms modernize and make them better able to deal with rising wages. This would enable more efficient production processes and thus better prices.

"The government should invest in improving the road system, with a focus on connecting ports with nearby agriculture areas. This would naturally benefit the production process by making lower freight fares possible."

 

References

 

Akinbobola, A. (n.d.), Broiler Feed Intake and Weight/Growth Chart, “Livestocking.net”,

https://www. livestocking.net/estimated-growth-feed-consumption-rates-broiler.

Alonzo, A. (2016), Foreign firms dominate Indonesian broiler production, “Poultry International”, October,

pp. 24-27.

Andersson, D.E., and Andersson, Å.E. (2018), Phase transitions as a cause of economic development, “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, 23 September, https://doi. org/10.1177/0308518X18803112, pp. 1-17.

Anonymous (2018a), Indonesian poultry integrators in expansion mode, “Asian Poultry Magazine”,

August, pp. 2-3.

Anonymous (2018b), Indonesia targets 500,000 tonnes of corn exports, “Asian Poultry Magazine”,

August, pp. 4-5.

Bayliss, P.A., and Hinton M.H. (1990), Transportation of broilers with special reference to mortality rates, “Applied Animal Behaviour Science”, 28, pp. 93-118, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168- 1591(90)90048-I.

Bergoug, H., et al. (2013), Effect of transportation duration of 1-day-old chicks on postplacement production performances and pododermatitis of broilers up to slaughter age, “Poultry Science”, 92, 12, pp. 3300- 3309, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03118.

Brockotter, F. (2017), Ventilation in the poultry house makes a world of difference, “PoultryWorld.net”, 19 August, https://www.poultryworld.net/Meat/Articles/2017/8/Ventilation-in-the-poultry-house- makes-a-world-of-difference-173187E/.

Collins, L.M. (2007), The Role of the Intensive Poultry Production Industry in the Spread of Avian Influenza. A report by Compassion in World Farming February 2007, Godalming, UK, Compassion in World Farming.

Conway, A. (2017), Poultry meat production up 13 million metric tons by 2026, in WATT Executive Guide to World Poultry Trend 2017, Rockford, IL, Watt, pp. 22-29.

Cowen, T., and Tabarrok, A. (2015), Modern Principles: Microeconomics, New York, NY, Worth Publishers. European Commission (2018a), Poultry meat market presentations and prices, https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/poultry/presentations_en.

European Commission (2018b), Egg market presentations and prices, https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ eggs/presentations_en.

Fachrudin, A. (2018), ULU eyes exports to Southeast Asia, “Asian Poultry Magazine”, August, pp. 14-17.

 

Ferguson, A. (1782), An Essay on the History of Civil Society, https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/ferguson-an-

essay-on-the-history-of-civil-society.


Ferlito, C. (2013), Phoenix Economics. From Crisis to Renascence, New York, Nova Science Publishers.

Freddy, I.M., and Kumara Gupta, G.E. (2018), Strengthening Food Security Policy: Reforms on Hybrid Maize Seeds Delivery Mechanism, Jakarta, Center for Indonesian Policy Studies.

Haberler, G. (1936), The Theory of International Trade, London, William Hodge.


Heyne, P.L., Boettke, P.J., and Prychitko, D.L. (2014), The Economic Way of Thinking, Harlow, Pearson

Education Limited.

von Hayek, F.A. (1937), Economics and Knowledge, “Economica”, 4, 13, pp. 33-54.

von Hayek, F.A. (1945), The Use of Knowledge in Society, “American Economic Review”, 35, 4, pp. 519-530.

von Hayek, F.A. (1946) [1948], The Meaning of Competition, in Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 92-106.

von Hayek, F.A. (1968) [2002], Competition as a Discovery Procedure, “The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics”, 5, 3, pp. 9-23.

von Hayek, F.A. (1974), The Pretence of Knowledge, Friedrich A. Hayek’s Nobel Prize Lecture delivered at the ceremony awarding him the Nobel Prize in economics in Stockholm, Sweden, December 11, 1974, https://mises.org/library/pretense-knowledge.

Huerta de Soto, J. (1992) [2010], Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar.

Huerta de Soto, J. (2000) [2008], The Austrian School. Market Order and Entrepreneurial Creativity, Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar.

Indonesia Investments (2017), Infrastructure Development in Indonesia, “Indonesia-Investments.com”, 23 June, https://www.indonesia-investments.com/business/risks/infrastructure/item381?.

Iowa Economic Development Authority (2013), Poultry Sector in Southeast Asia, Singapore, Orissa International.

Kirzner, I.M. (1973), Competition and entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Koppl, R. (2018), Expert Failure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Kumar, V. (n.d.), Poultry Feed Formulation, “Lybrate.com”, https://www.lybrate.com/topic/poultry-feed-form ulation/229085e4e7ee77c39d6248d860cfb805.

Lachmann, L.M. (1976), From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society, “Journal of Economic Literature”, 14, 1, pp. 54-62,

Lavoie, D. (1985a) [2015], Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered, Arlington, VA, Mercatus Center.

Lavoie, D. (1985b) [2016], National Economic Planning: What is Left?, Arlington, VA, Mercatus Center.


McKay (2008), The genetics of modern commercial poultry, in Proceedings of the 23rd World Poultry Congress,

Brisbane, Australia.

von Mises, L. (1920) [1990], Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, Auburn, AL, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

 

von Mises, L. (1957) [2007], Theory and History. An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution, Auburn, AL, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mitchell, M.D., and Boettke, P.J. (2017), Applied Mainline Economics. Bridging the Gap between Theory and Public Policy, Arlington, VA, Mercatus Center.

Mulder, N.-D. (2018a), Poultry Quarterly Q2 2018, Amsterdam, Rabobank.

Mulder, N.-D. (2018b), Poultry Quarterly Q3 2018, Amsterdam, Rabobank.

Mulder, N.-D., Kumar, P., and van Horne, P. (2015), Indonesian Poultry industry towards 2025. Long term perspective on the Indonesia poultry value chain, Jakarta, Rabobank.

Oxford Business Group (2017), Infrastructure key to Indonesia’s development, in The Report Indonesia 2018, https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/structurally-committed-pushing-forward-key- area-development.

Partners, R. (2017a), PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia: Largest And Fully-Integrated Poultry Producer In Indonesia, “SeekingAlpha.com”, 10 May, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4071591-pt-charoen- pokphand-indonesia-largest-fully-integrated-poultry-producer-indonesia.

Partners, R. (2017b), Malindo Feedmill: Turnaround Not Reflected In Share Price, “SeekingAlpha.com”, 17 April, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4062719-malindo-feedmill-turnaround-reflected-share- price.

Phillips, C. (2018), Asean poultry welfare standards, “Asian Poultry Magazine”, September, pp. 30-39.

Respatiadi, H., and Nabila, H. (2017), Beefing Up the Stock: Policy Reform to Lower Beef Price in Indonesia,

Jakarta, Center for Indonesian Policy Studies.

Ricardo, D. (1817) [2001], On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Kitchener, Batoche Books.

Rothbard, M.N. (1995) [2006], An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, Volume ii:Classical Economics, Auburn, AL, Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Salna, K. (2018), Indonesia Needs $157 Billion for Infrastructure Plan, “Bloomberg.com”, 26 January, https:// www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-25/indonesia-seeks-to-plug-157-billion-gap-in- nation-building-plan.

Saptana and Rusastra, I.W. (2001), Dampak Krisis Moneter dan Kebijaksanaan Pemerintah terhadap Daya Saing Agribisnis Ayam Ras Pedaging di Jawa Barat, “Journal of Socioeconomics of Agriculture and Agribusiness”, 1, 1, https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/soca/article/view/3986.

Santoso, B. (2016), Indonesia’s Growing Appetite for Animal Protein. An Overview of Business Models, Opportunities and Strategies, DBS Asian Insights, Sector Briefing 21.

Shackle, G.L.S. (1972) [2009], Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines, New Brunswick and London, Transaction Publishers.

So-hiun, K. (2013), CJ rises as beacon of Korean food, shopping, pop culture, “Korea Herald”, 4 March, http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130304000759.

Sulistiyono, A.G. (2016), Cargill, Japfa create joint venture in poultry business, “The Jakarta Post”, 21 September, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/09/21/cargill-japfa-create-joint-venture- in-poultry-business.html.

 

USAID (2013), Indonesia’s Poultry Value Chain. Costs. Margins, Prices, and Other Issues, Nathan Associates Inc.

Varian, H.R. (2010), Intermediate Microeconomics. A Modern Approach, New York, W.W. Norton & Company.

 

Wahyono, N.D., and Utami, M.M.D. (2018), A Review of the Poultry Meat Production Industry for Food Safety in

Indonesia, “Journal of Physics: Conference Series”, 953, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012125.

Wright, T., and Darmawan, B. (2017), Voluntary Poultry Report, gain Report 1701.

Ycharts (2018), US Chicken Wholesale Price, https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_chicken_wholesale_price_ georgia_dock.

Yonekura, H. (2015), Institutional Reform in Indonesia’s Food Security Sector: the Transformation of BULOG into a Public Corporation, “The Developing Economies”, xliii, 1, pp. 121-148.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Food Policy | November 2018

Policy Reforms on poultry industry in Indonesia

This study provides policy recommendations to improve the poultry industry and modernize the sector. 

 
 
kontak

+62 21 227 69 233

Jalan Terogong Raya No. 6B 

Cilandak

Jakarta Selatan 12430

Indonesia

ikuti
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon
  • YouTube Social  Icon
Center for Indonesian Policy Studies is officially registered
under the name Yayasan Cipta Sentosa 

© 2019 Center for Indonesian Policy Studies